Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:31

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Bitcoin Rebounds as Markets Price in 'Short-Lived' Iran Conflict - Decrypt
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What is the XXX XXX Keerna Kappor video?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What should we make of Taiwan's move to erase the category "Han" from its official information page?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Science news this week: 'Dragon Man's' identity and the universe's 'missing matter' - Live Science
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.